OBESE teenage girls achieve less, academically, than their peers, says research from the universities of Strathclyde, Dundee, Georgia and Bristol, regardless of financial circumstances, IQ or background.
Associations between obesity and academic attainment, the report showed, were not as clear in boys.
Professor John Reilly, principal investigator, said: "Further work is needed to understand why obesity is negatively related to academic attainment." Is it really? I would have thought this result was obvious.
I'd bet my Higher grades that these results are linked to self-esteem.
High school is a tough place for the most mentally and physically robust but imagine coping with your own adolescence and other adolescents while not physically fitting in.
It's a problem, for Scotland, that can only become more pronounced. Young people are sedentary, they are driven around and glued to screens. Sportscotland says that girls, especially, become inactive around the age of 14.
The number of obese children and teenagers has trebled since 1990. Studies show obesity leads to depressive symptoms and encourages absenteeism. Obese children report being stigmatised by both peers and teachers.
If you're at home and blue and being treated unkindly by those around you, how do you achieve your potential? I wonder, though, if low self-esteem is the cause of teenage obesity or is caused by it.
Low self-esteem among girls and young women is an oft-reported, increasingly common trend. That weight - overeating, or not eating enough - is a marker and reflection of how girls feel about themselves is not up for debate. Neither is the fact self-esteem for girls is based so heavily on how they look. How to deal with it is the question.
Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook's chief operating officer and author of the book Lean In, has launched a campaign to urge girls towards leadership roles. She wants to ban the word "bossy". Sandberg writes on her website for Ban Bossy: "When a little boy asserts himself, he's called a 'leader.' Yet when a little girl does the same, she risks being branded 'bossy'."
These double standards contribute to the "confidence gap" between boys and girls. Bossy is a gender-coded word that stops girls achieving their potential, which leads to low self-esteem.
Sandberg repeatedly suggests, as a solution, setting a good example. Don't call your daughter bossy, call her assertive - she's just honing her management skills. Talk to her about marketing and the media. Explain that what she sees on television is not a fair representation of real life. It's all such blinding common sense packaged into a jam-packed, high-powered website of interactive activities.
Banning a word is an interesting start but, rather, we need a whole new lexicon. Girls and boys are conditioned from their earliest years by language proscribing how they should think, behave and aspire.
Girls are Little Princesses, boys are Heroes. Girls are praised for appearances while boys are praised for character. Teenage boys and girls face the same academic challenges but girls have the added responsibility of their looks. Rarely is there a safe haven for an overweight girl. Where are the role models for that? Boys have all sorts of TV and film oddities to soothe them. The comic book geek becomes the superhero.
I wish I could tell all teenage girls to be kind to themselves. To be kind to themselves and to each other. That once you stop trying to be perfect you can be good. To value their academic achievements and athleticism and hobbies.
I'd like them also to have as their mantra the words of my favourite kick-ass superhero, Beyonce: "I'm not bossy. I'm the boss."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article