This week marks six months to go until the referendum which will decide Scotland's constitutional future.
On the plus side, the debate surrounding independence has at last grabbed the public's imagination. All over the country, people are attending public meetings and connecting with politics in a way which we have not seen for decades.
No matter the outcome, a country in which more and more people are thinking seriously about its values and potential is a country enriched.
On the negative side, the standard of political debate continues to fail to rise to the challenges presented by the referendum.
We have complained before about Better Together's addiction to scare stories and the dangers posed by its suggestions that Scotland is simply not up to the task of running its own affairs.
Yet these scare stories persist, addressing everything from the economy and Europe to oil and our universities.
The recent televised debate between Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon and Labour's Scottish leader Johann Lamont showed in an all too depressing manner that neither side is above opening their mouths and shutting their ears.
The open letter, A Commitment To Respectful Dialogue, published in this newspaper today, is a sensible contribution to the debate.
The discussion around independence is by its nature potentially divisive, and it is right that both sides should be driven by passion and determination.
However, on September 19, Scotland - whether independent or not - must live with itself and its people must face the challenges of the future together.
The fewer fences which need mended, the less bitterness felt and venom spat out, the better it will be for us all.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article