ONE attendee at BP's annual gathering last week had an unusual motivation.
"My doctor told me to go into the meeting and ask a question," he told the oil giant's directors and the hundreds of shareholders gathered in the cavernous Excel Centre in London.
Having suffered a stroke, his physician wanted him to regain confidence in his speech by questioning some of the most powerful people in global the industry.
The reasons for people attending company annual meetings are varied: duty, a free lunch, perhaps, even, mental stimulation.
But the events form an important, if sometimes deeply tedious, part of the financial journalist's calendar.
Some annual meetings are very lively indeed.
Those attending BAE Systems' event are usually greeted outside by giant puppets paraded by anti-arms trade demonstrators and impassioned arguments inside.
On occasion, they are almost party-like. Marks & Spencer attracts hundreds of people to its gathering in the Royal Festival Hall where shareholders are plied with food and drink before being shown the retailer's latest ranges.
Contrast this to the muted atmosphere at the Halifax Bank of Scotland meeting in Birmingham in 2008 that approved the company's capitulation to a rescue takeover by Lloyds TSB and a state bailout.
Many events have a slight whiff of Pyongyang about them, with brusque dismissals of dissenting voices and a roll-call of 99% of votes in favour of management resolutions.
On occasion a company will seek to bar the press from these meetings, a practice that is almost always counter-productive because we will inevitably know someone inside who will tell us what happened. It also draws attention to the matter - invariably executive pay - that they are attempting to obscure.
The events throw up their own minor celebrities. You can anticipate a collective groan from the media benches when the ubiquitous John Farmer stands up at company meetings in London.
But you will find many of us quoting him in articles because while his perorations can be extraordinarily long, they are well informed and often brutally cutting. North of the Border, the likes of John Cruickshank and Mary Mackenzie have kept generations of Scottish executives on their toes.
Annual investor meetings can produce real change. The campaign for a living wage has been boosted by the number of wealthy executives left squirming when the pay rates of their own staff has been revealed. Now major companies like Barclays are committed to paying wages that are sufficient to live off.
Despite the odd controversy, such as 2012's Shareholder Spring rebellions on pay, large shareholders are usually invisible at these events.
Standard Life Investments of Edinburgh is a rare example of a fund manager who, now and again, speaks out publicly.
It is time the others followed the lead Britain's fearless band of private investors, and held our corporate chiefs to account
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article