IT was no coincidence that Alex Salmond's most eye-catching announcement at the recent SNP conference was the creation of two new posts in his Cabinet, both occupied by women.
The promotion of Shona Robison and Angela Constance from junior ministers to the top team was an unabashed appeal to the undecided female voters who may hold the key to the independence referendum.
Women, the polls say, are consistently and markedly less supportive of independence than men, so the First Minister is wooing female voters.
"We practice what we preach," he said, adding he wanted Scottish companies to have 40% female representation in the boardroom.
"The Cabinet is our board as a country, and women will make up 40% of the Cabinet."
But as we report today, an analysis by the Scottish Parliament's Information Centre shows that having a seat at the Cabinet table is one thing, but having the money and responsibility to got with it is quite another.
Until September 2012, the department with the largest budget and some of the trickiest issues, health, was run by Nicola Sturgeon.
But a breakdown of this year's budget shows the female 40% of the Cabinet oversees just 12% of discretionary spending. The three smallest spending portfolios have all been allocated to women, while men run the three largest.
Labour said today's figures are proof the First Minister's promotions were merely window-dressing.
We do not doubt Salmond believes a greater role for women in public life and business is a good thing in itself and should be encouraged. But it has to be meaningful.
If he is to avoid the perception of cynicism, the First Minister must redistribute money and influence more evenly among his top team.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article