In its review of the use of stop and search tactics by Police Scotland, the Scottish Police Authority (SPA) found they contribute to tackling violence and antisocial behaviour in Scotland.
This is open to question. Evidence that policing policy has made a substantive difference to the decline in violent crime in Scotland, or England, or other parts of Europe is limited to non-existent. It is a prevailing trend in much of the Western world, regardless of local policing policy.
Perhaps this is one reason why the SPA notes a vagueness about justification for using stop and search. Its report points out that neither officers nor communities are really clear whether the goal of stop and search is to deter crime or to reduce it.
The justification matters because there is a danger here too. The SPA concludes there are risks in the way the tactic is applied, and how it affects different groups - particularly young people and certain communities.
Happily there is no evidence of ethnic minorities being disproportionately targeted. But there is an emphasis on stopping and searching young people - those aged 15 to 19 are more likely to be stopped, and one-third of all stop and searches were carried out on older children and teenagers.
While young men in particular are more likely to commit crime, there are people within and without the police who are uneasy that excessive application of this policing tactic could undermine the force's relationships with younger people.
There are also significant civil liberties issues here. If members of the public, especially young people, are to be stopped on a voluntary basis, it is vital that they realise this.
There is a difference between statutory stop and search, when police have reasonable cause to search a person, an non-statutory stop and search, to which a person can refuse to submit.
But there is no consent if people do not know the difference. The power imbalance between a police officer and a young person for example is such that the latter is not likely to challenge a demand that they submit to a search - unless it is clearly explained that they can.
There have to be questions about the ability of younger children to give informed consent at all to searching.
A lack of reliable statistics about the issue has been one of the complicating factors of the debate. Figures showing more than 500 children under 10 being stopped and searched in a single year - including dozens under the age of seven - are alarming.
But it has not always been clear in the past what constitutes a stop and search. The idea of the consensual search needs serious reconsideration and may be untenable. The Scottish Government should also look at the case for extending statutory powers to cover searching young people for alcohol.
However, the SPA is right to say there needs to be a great deal more transparency to protect public confidence, and in the mean time police training is essential so those who are able to decline to submit to searching know they have that right.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article