SINCE becoming ill over the last year, I have become an avid listener of Revival Radio, a Christian radio station located in Cumbernauld.
As well as playing well-known hymns and less well known songs, the station has regular discussions on up-to-date topics of human interest.
Recently they were discussing the right to die campaign, whose recent greatest advocate was the late Margo MacDonald, and as the programme progressed I became more and more disillusioned by some people's thinking on this serious matter. The discussion covered a frightening development by proponents who think that old people should consider suicide as a way of relieving the care professions of their responsibilities to them, and also to help save money in the long run for the younger, up-and-coming in society. It was mentioned that it costs five times more to care for someone with dementia than for someone with cancer, so this would be a way of reducing that bill.
Did I hear right? How do you cost a life, and what is its price? And how old is old? To me a life is precious and priceless, and everyone should be allowed to live theirs in peace, and live out their days (if it becomes necessary) by relying on the care professions whose raison d'etre is and should be to look after society, no matter the cost.
I firmly believe that our lives, given by God, are also only God's to take, not ours in any shape or form.
John Ross,
45 Fereneze Avenue, Clarkston.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article