THOSE pushing for an English parliament have a new rallying cry:
"no taxation without representation". Or should that be: "no representation without taxation"? The pledge by the Tories, Liberals and Labour to give Holyrood greater tax-raising powers if there is a No vote in September has reinvigorated a decades-old debate.
High-profile Conservatives such as one-time leadership contender John Redwood argue there is now an urgent need to find an answer to that most knotty of political problems, the West Lothian Question.
English taxpayers will not countenance Scots MPs voting on taxes they themselves would not have to pay, he warns. The heat around the issue could intensify if there is a No vote and Labour, with many Scottish and Welsh MPs, wins next year's general election by a narrow margin.
But increased pressure alone will not find a solution to the issue. For while Tories calling for a system of "English votes for English laws" say Labour opposition is based on self-interest, a charge Labour throws back at them, the truth is there are plenty of bear traps for all political parties.
So far the SNP are the only party that thinks it has a clear cut solution - independence. Unsurprisingly, this has failed to win over pro-Union politicians.
Some hope lay with the McKay Commission, set up by the Coalition a few years ago to look into the issue but its recommendations appeared to please no-one.
Labour's concerns over "English votes" include the risk of unintended consequences. Some fear an English Parliament sitting within Westminster could ultimately lead to a federalist UK, a policy only the LibDems back.
There are also concerns among some that designating more and more legislation English, Scottish, Welsh or Northern Irish-only would drive a wedge between the parts of the UK, leading ultimately to Scottish independence.
The biggest fear is the size of England would mean other parts of the UK could not help but feel the effect of its decisions, without having any say and with their politicians "second class" MPs.
Research by Labour MP Tom Greatrex highlights how little legislation at the moment is genuinely England-only. Also, what of the potential effects on politicians and political parties themselves, with all that could mean for voters?
Would Scottish and Welsh MPs be able to run Westminster departments that deal in large part, but not exclusively, with English issues?
If politicians from smaller parts of the UK found themselves, by consequence, effectively barred from the top job of party leader or Prime Minister, would the parties fracture?
In a speech on the issue on Tuesday night Mr Redwood even suggested an English First Minister might be needed.
The thought of a large, separate power base within the Commons is intriguing just days after the Tory mayor of London announced his plans to return to Westminster. Boris for English Prime Minister anyone? Any future commission on the issue will have its work cut out.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article