There is a big danger lurking in Scottish foreign policy.
And that big danger is that we don't realise we have such a thing.
Scotland, after all, last year became one of the very few places on the planet - along with the likes of Quebec, Bermuda and Montenegro - to ever have voted against its own independence.
And that - at least according to some unionists - means First Minister Nicola Sturgeon shouldn't be strutting her stuff on the international stage. Except she does. Except, I would argue, she ought to.
Because it isn't just sovereign states which have foreign interests and foreign policies. So too do "regions" or stateless nations like our own.
Take China. Ms Sturgeon is right now on a five-day trip to the world's biggest country. In doing so she follows her predecessors Alex Salmond of her own party and Jack McConnell of Labour.
Her remit here is clear. She is overseas pursuing policy objectives in devolved areas: business and trade development, education and culture. But Ms Sturgeon didn't just talk about devolved matters. "We are promoting a very distinctive approach to creating a more competitive economy," she said before leaving, "one that is based on a fair society."
So Ms Sturgeon is raising women's rights when meeting officials.
That's a pretty significant foreign policy move for a place the Chinese don't even think is a country (they find the concept of a "country" or "nation" that isn't a sovereign "state" almost impossible to express linguistically).
Her domestic opponents will hate it, but Ms Sturgeon really is a player on the world stage. When in America early last month, for example, she was profiled in the New York Times.
She was introduced as "Scotland’s feminist first minister". Note: not "nationalist first minister"; her views on the constitution did not need explaining.
Raising women's rights fits that feminist billing perfectly.
But the big international story about Scotland isn't that Ms Sturgeon is a feminist; it is that we have what most of the world regards as a "separatist" administration.
That is why world media are today headlining Mr Salmond's view - expressed on Sunday - that a second independence referendum is "inevitable". That is why Nicola Sturgeon is a well-kent face.
Scotland is now one of the world's great rolling news events. Our story, moreover, has inspired many other stateless nations, not least in China. And here is where Scottish foreign policy gets real: the impact we have on separatism, independence - call it what you want - in dozens of different places.
So what does Ms Sturgeon's separatist government do to support other separatist causes? Well, nothing.
Her predecessor, Mr Salmond, shunned Quebec sovereigntists and distanced himself from independence-minded Catalans, in public at least.
The SNP, insiders explain, doesn't want to be seen as some kind of separatist version of Comintern, the Moscow body set up in the early days of Soviet Russia to provoke socialist revolution across the world.
What is the result of such a stance? Well, in China this weekend, it brought another deal that encourages Chinese soft power through Confucius Institutes and Classrooms in Scottish schools and universities. Was this foreign policy? Yes, even if this was unacknowledged. How do those supporting Chinese human rights, not least in occupied Tibet, feel about this? Answer: betrayed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel