MUCH as the information your report on findings by the Taxpayers’ Alliance (“19 years in work to pay average life’s tax bills”, The Herald, July 31) is welcome, not to say mind-boggling in that it tells us our lifetime tax bill is £734, the curative conclusions arrived at stray from the hard truths of the assembled statistics.
The alliance’s conclusions about ensuring apparently badly needed tax reduction is but a reinforcement argument for austerity. Bad enough it tells us the terrifying amount of total tax we pay in our lifetimes, but to alleviate this awful news it then tells us, in effect, that austerity is the answer: “Every arm of local and central government must redouble its efforts to root out unnecessary spending and inefficiency in everything they do,” without identifying specific areas of wastage.
In a week in which Britain’s Upper Chamber has come under badly-needed fresh scrutiny, it surely isn’t hard to find specific areas of wastage
Packed to the gunnels with people paid £300-per-day attendance money, lolling in their ermine robery (tax-financed no doubt) and funded in their feasting and lavish lifestyle by, guess what, our taxes.
But the alliance’s conclusion is merely that the excessive taxation is due to public service wastage, which sounds a bit like the present Government that also ignores the extravagances at its domestic back door and doesn’t seem to mind lashing out billions updating already sufficiently destructive nuclear weaponry.
What about the discrepancies between rich and poor that the report highlights, showing how the poor are paying proportionately more tax than the rich?
It is one thing to produce reports; curative conclusions are something else.
Ian Johnstone,
84 Forman Drive,
Peterhead.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel