The Scottish Government will, as usual, no doubt rubber-stamp the implantation of hundreds of bird-killing off-shore wind-turbines in close proximity to our fabulous seabird colonies such as Bass Rock. The latest research shows that, beyond any doubt, gannets will be using airspace where most damage will be caused ("Fears that offshore turbines may kill up to 1,500 sea birds", The Herald, September 28).
For Hannah Smith of Scottish Renewables to say the sample size is too small shows a total lack of knowledge on the behaviour of seabirds such as gannets. Gannets behave similarly. When fish are near the surface they make shallow dives, when fish are deeper they dive from considerable height. Even the most novice birdwatcher knows this and now it has been proven with accurate data.
The bases of the proposed killer turbines will also attract fish, as do all artificial sub-marine structures. Gannets and other seabirds will in turn be attracted to these, and killed. I fear the predicted 1,500 deaths will prove a gross under-estimate.
While gannets have keen eyesight they are not so good in sea-fog (or haar) or in sleet or hail, when turbines will be rotating at their fastest. Gannets, and many other seabirds such as Fulmars and gulls are also active at night. One only has to watch a fishing documentary on TV to notice that the seas around trawlers are covered in birds even in the pitch black of night.
The offshore construction of wind turbines should be halted until more thoughtful planning and advice is sought. Indeed the Government should buck its trend and accept that offshore turbines are little more than seabird killing machines.
Bernard Zonfrillo,
28 Brodie Road,
Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel