I NOTE your report on the controversial proposal by Homes for Heroes for two dwellings in Bloomhill, near Cardross (“Charity faces battle to build homes for wounded heroes”, The Herald, February 8).
The proposed development would entail the partial demolition of a stone wall which extends from the old Parish Church graveyard. The wall bounds the pavement on the main road and therefore possesses a high visual profile. It is also a listed structure and any alteration would be to the detriment of the visual and historic integrity of the streetscape in this part of the village. It would also be contrary to the existing policy of Historic Scotland and Argyll Bute Council to protect such structures for their architectural and historic character.
Breaching the wall would create an additional very unwelcome exit to the main road which, at this point, is a known accident back spot.
A local public meeting was held two years ago following a previous planning application for a similar development. There is a planning presumption against encroachment of development into green belt and local opinion, including that of Cardross Community Council, is eager to maintain that position. We feel sure that any local requirement for suitable accommodation for disabled servicemen could be met within other proposed development sites.
In recent weeks the owner of the site has been going round the village to try to rally support for his development. Not everyone has been in possession of full details of the issues. This previous application was overwhelmingly opposed by the local community and subsequently rejected by Argyll & Bute Council. Since then, nothing has changed.
Bob Murray,
6 Napier Avenue, Cardross.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here