THE First Minister cannot be surprised that she was pressed on the fracking moratorium in First Minister’s Questions (“Sturgeon ‘highly sceptical’ of fracking as industry fears missed opportunity”, The Herald, March 4). After all, there are many doubters of what her Government’s position really is amongst her own supporters and MSPs, as well in the ranks of her opponents. The suspicion is the SNP leadership has already made up its mind in advance of getting the results of the research study that it has commissioned, and is simply unsure before seeing its conclusions how these will be spun to best effect.
Those who are in favour of exploring the potential of fracking, such as Ineos, which has been encouraged by the Scottish Government to invest so much in Grangemouth, must be wondering whether the reassurances received are simply politicians stringing them along or if it is the public at large that are being misled.
The only thing that is clear is that the First Minister has no intention of telling us what she really thinks before the May election.
Keith Howell,
White Moss, West Linton, Peeblesshire.
THE First Minister's scepticism about fracking may be pragmatism rather than scepticism, with the sub-plot being a switch to enthusiasm after elections in May. There appears to be no hesitation in permitting the products of fracking elsewhere (that is, the United States) being imported into Grangemouth, such we are informed being necessary to keep the Grangemouth refinery financially viable.
This Nimby decision reeks of hypocrisy, parallel to importing by the National Grid electricity generated by nuclear means outside Scotland and the lucrative export from Scotland of an addictive drug (ethyl alcohol, whisky) which causes massive damage to the Scottish people.
Recommended reading: Holy Willie's Prayer (Robert Burns).
William Durward,
20 South Erskine Park, Bearsden.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel