I NOTE that the anti-smoking brigade have been trotting out the dogma again (“The first smoke-free decade has seen Scottish pub culture change rapidly”, The Herald, March 26) despite the disastrous impact on to social gatherings, and the realisation in other parts of the world that anti-smoking laws are far to draconian to be sustained. Others have realised that independent science in the United States, free from any influence of the tobacco companies, has proved that the dangers of second-hand smoke is a myth and that asthma continues to rise despite the anti-smoking laws and indeed had nothing to do with tobacco, being entirely the fault of the internal combustion engine. The oil companies love the anti-smoking brigade for hiding that fact.
As for the sensible people of Holland, Croatia, and Germany, they have no doubt actually read the science, and in the case of Germany, government-sponsored research has reported that tobacco consumption brought in a far greater tax take to the government than any health cost it may have. Given that tobacco is cheaper there and so the tax take lower than the high tobacco tax situation we have here, then I think that it is safe to say that the dogma foisted on us by the anti-smoking lobby concerning health versus cost is nonsense.
Smokers, non-smokers, and others, be they politicians, media or otherwise, need to stand up to the anti-smoking dogma, check facts and bring a degree of sense into this matter.
Alex Flett,
Lochfergus House, Kirkcudbright.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel