I AGREE entirely with Linda Holt's excellent letter (April 13) on wind farms. I would add that there is another effect on Scotland; the damage to its tourist industry.
In 2005 there were 17.3 million tourist trips compared to 15.52 million in 2014 – yet 2014 was the big year for tourism with the Commonwealth Games, Ryder Cup and the second year of Homecoming. I believe the outrageous number of wind farms is a large factor, and I speak as one who has had bed and breakfast visitors for 14 years. Some investors, it seems, agree.
Aberdeen Capital Ltd pledged to invest millions to create a five-star hotel and Michelin-starred restaurant in Carbisdale Castle, near Bonar Bridge in Sutherland. It has withdrawn from the deal because of plans for a community buy-out of nearby land and because of a proposed 18-turbine wind farm at nearby Braemore Forest. The developer is quoted as saying about the wind farm plans: “Had we known this in May 2014, we certainly would have approached the whole project in a completely different manner.” He said this meant the time spent on the project over the past two years had been “a total waste of our time”.
It is plain common sense that if the vast majority of tourists come to see the scenery and you trash the scenery, they won't come. The interests of tourism have been badly served because the SNP in 2007 made the minister in charge of energy also in charge of tourism. What do they have in common?
I believe the SNP has sacrificed Scotland's tourist industry for its flagship policy and Scotland will suffer dearly for it over the 25-year lifetime of the turbines.
Celia Hobbs,
Dykeneuk, Peebles Road, Penicuik.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel