There is a lingering suspicion among many observers that electronic cigarettes re-normalise smoking and that, in doing so, they are all vapour and mirrors when it comes to health.
For their part, vapers say no smoke passes their lips – only vapour – and that e-cigarettes have caused them not only to quit smoking but to despise it. That view from the frontline receives strong support today, with a report by the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) that e-cigarettes can help smokers give up their addiction to tobacco.
Indeed, in a debate often characterised by confusion and uncertainty, the RCP is unequivocally clear in its finding that e-cigarettes can be a public health tool. Professor John Britton, who chairs the organisation’s Tobacco Advisory Group, says the report “lays to rest” almost all concerns about vaping. “Smokers,” he counsels, “should be reassured that these products can help them quit all tobacco use forever.”
The report notes that almost all 2.6 million e-cigarette users in the UK are or have been smokers, and that a third no longer smoke traditional cigarettes. That success is attributed partly to e-cigarettes reproducing “many of the behavioural and sensory characteristics of smoking”. True, long-term use might induce a threat of chronic illness, but the researchers put this at under five per cent of the risk from smoking tobacco.
The anti-smoking charity, ASH Scotland, raises an important point about preventing promotion of e-cigarettes to non-smokers, particularly children. But for many adults, far from being a gateway to tobacco, vaping has provided an exit from it.
And, with legislators often finding it difficult to find their way through the fug of claim and counter-claim, there is a need to heed the RCP’s warning about over-regulation potentially discouraging smokers from taking this evidently useful step back to full re-normalisation: That is to say, the breathing of fresh air.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel