THE growing number of voices across Scottish industrial and political life speaking-up for the potential benefits of fracking should be welcomed because, after all, this is a debate about our energy future and the national interest (“Ineos throws down gauntlet as it fights back on fracking”, The Herald, June 15.
According to the Scottish Government’s own data, 78 per cent of Scottish households need gas to heat their homes - an increase of six per cent over the last decade. Our chemicals manufacturing sector, a huge chunk of what little we have left of manufacturing in Scotland, needs gas as an affordable feedstock.
So the idea that we can heat our homes or run our industries without fossil fuels anytime soon is a nonsense and fracking presents a viable opportunity to help address the economic, employment and energy challenges of today and tomorrow.
That’s why the sobering interventions from the likes of Ineos Upstream Chief Executive Gary Haywood and former deputy eader of the SNP Jim Sillars should snap the likes of Scottish Labour out of their slumbering on fracking.
Abandoning a balanced energy strategy will mean importing more gas from questionable regimes which have no regard whatsoever for human rights or the environment, never mind tackling fuel poverty or redistributing wealth in the form of job creation.
Indeed, the likely reality for many people will be an increase in their heating bills as affordable gas comes offline and dependence on more expensive electricity from renewables increases. There is no political kudos to be earned here.
The mature and sensible course of action would be to allow the consultations, studies and testing to take place on fracking while debating as a parliament about how we can maximise and regulate the opportunities it affords us.
Gary Smith,
GMB Scotland Secretary,
Fountain House, 1/3 Woodside Crescent, Charing Cross, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel