YOUR nationalist letter writers who are upset that 58 out of 59 MPs in Scotland are against Trident but its renewal will go ahead anyway, appear to miss the bigger democratic perspective (Letters, 20 July).
Polls shows that Scotland is fairly evenly split on the matter of Trident renewal. What about those of us who support it? Who speaks for us? How can it be right that the one in two of us who support renewal are represented by one MP out of 59? What about that massive representation deficit?
Thankfully, those of us who are unrepresented by our MPs in Scotland are grateful for the rest of the British Parliament, which includes MPs who can speak for us on this matter.
We saw a similar lack of representation between voters in Scotland and our political class at the EU referendum.
Around two in five Scots voted Leave. Yet we are represented by no MPs at all, and fewer than one in 20 MSPs.
How is this effective representation? Again, we can be grateful for the rest of the British Parliament, some of whose MPs help to provide a voice for the two out of five of us who voted Leave.
It is of increasing concern that huge swathes of opinion in Scotland are now going entirely unrepresented in our democratic structures and in the media. In this regard, the British Parliament is our saving grace. Indeed, one of the strongest arguments for it is that it can help to provide this democratic balance when Scotland's structures provide none.
Your letter writers who imagine that we would be better represented outside the UK appear to be happy for Scotland to be a one-party state; and where those of us who don't go along with their programme will have no recourse to other centres of political power.
Alistair McConnachie,
268 Bath Street, Glasgow.
IN the wake of the recent EU referendum the venerable BBC correspondent Edward Stourton wrote that politics is not like the end of some village cricket match where everybody shakes hands before heading into the clubhouse for a cup of tea. It is a little more complicated. Hence when Rosemary Goring (“Democracy is not a pick and mix ... we must accept Brexit”, The Herald, July 19), perhaps a little too reasonably, and some of your other correspondents, often quite unreasonably, write about accepting the result of the vote as if the losing side were sitting with their eyes shut and their hands over their ears, they are rather over-simplifying the situation.
True democracy includes two important features, respect for the votes of the majority certainly, but also respect for the rights of the minority. Even before last weekend's attempted coup in Turkey we should have been aware that all was not right with the democratic process there. President Erdogan and his government were certainly democratically elected but his harassment of political opponents, use of the mob to enforce his authority and the imprisonment of journalists critical of his policies does not suggest a country run in a particularly democratic way. We are indeed fortunate to live in a country which goes beyond mere democratic process and it is to her credit that Theresa May has begun her time in office stating that she seeks a Brexit that will work for all. How this is achieved remains to be seen but it will be necessary to discuss a wide range of possibilities from both sides of the argument. Attempts to close down this discussion will be to nobody's benefit.
Robin Irvine,
4 Abercromby Place West, Helensburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel