IT is hard to know where to start with Donald Trump’s foreign policy. For one thing, his confused, inconsistent and dangerous pronouncements on foreign affairs and America’s place in the world simply do not deserve the word “policy” – rather they are the rantings of a rich, angry white man with a poor grasp of the facts. As President Obama pointed out at the weekend, being president requires self discipline - you have to do your homework.
President Obama also took aim at one of Mr Trump’s wildest statements. In a recent interview, the Republican nominee said that allies who did not pay their NATO dues would not be guaranteed American help if they needed it.
Not only is this a flagrant breach of the founding principle of NATO that an attack on one is an attack on all, it is a direct contradiction of what Mr Trump himself has said before – were he president, he once said, America would be a reliable ally again. President Obama’s verdict was that the Republican’s comment was yet more proof of Mr Trump’s lack of preparedness on American foreign policy.
The evidence of this lack of preparedness is in everything Mr Trump says. In his hateful and dark speech at the Republican convention, he repeated his attacks on immigrants, but his proposed ban on all Muslims entering the US (since watered down to Muslims from countries with a history of terrorism) is an offensive and unconstitutional mess. It would also do very little to prevent attacks – after all, half of the attacks in America since 2001 have been committed by people born in the United States
There is some evidence of Mr Trump rolling back on his wildest statements, but a potential president who says he will put America first at all costs represents a real threat to global stability. We know from George W Bush how disastrous a president with a poor understanding of foreign affairs can be. America, and the world, cannot afford the same to happen again.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel