LAST week’s headlines reporting that a Glasgow taxi-driver was fined “just” £400 for hitting, with his driver’s door, a cyclist, who later died, have understandably enraged many oad-users. Most people’s first reaction is to feel angry or saddened that we put such little value on a life.
Such a meagre fine and the sheriff’s “surprise” as to the charge that was brought against the taxi-driver are hardly a deterrent for the next careless driver.
But let’s take a step back. There is another perspective. This was carelessness, but do we want to lock people away for such things? Criminal Law exists to protect the public and if we look at the act of carelessness rather than the consequences of that carelessness, the cabbie is not a danger to wider society. The sheriff handed out a sentence that matched the “crime” and according to what was in her power to give.
The process of Civil Law, on the other hand, enables those injured and bereaved to recover damages for their loss. In this case, the cyclist’s family should be compensated as the taxi driver admitted his error and the terrible consequences of his negligent act.
While the question “what price a life?” can never be adequately answered, Civil Law will provide recompense for the loved ones left behind. The very fact this case was brought to the criminal courts is a good thing.
Many such incidents, which may not be as catastrophic in their outcome, but can lead to injury or damage nonetheless, are not. The media interest has highlighted the vulnerability of cyclists on our roads and hopefully will make others more aware.
Jodi Gordon, Senior Solicitor, Cycle Law Scotland, 16-20 Castle Street, Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel