THE Scottish Government’s approval for the 22-turbine wind farm at Creag Riabhach near Altnaharra sends a worrying signal to all those who wish to see wild Scottish landscapes underpin the sustainable development of the Highlands.
Up until now Ministers had held true to the intent of their own planning policy and rejected industrial developments in what they themselves had identified as wild land of national importance. These areas were identified following an extensive public consultation and based on a rigorous methodology.
The simple fact is you cannot accommodate industrial developments in these places without fundamentally altering their character and destroying their appeal to the millions of tourists that are drawn to their unique qualities. Turbines towering 125m high above upland landscapes exert a visual impact far beyond their physical footprint.
The rapid success of the North Coast 500 testifies to the potential for kick-starting sustainable economic growth through tourism in the region. Wind farms have their benefits, not least in helping to address the challenge of climate change, but building them on peatland in wild land is short-sighted and will harm the interests of the many to profit the few.
Scottish Natural Heritage, the government’s own advisors, seem clear on this point: they objected to Creag Riabhach on these grounds. Scottish Ministers need to urgently clarify their commitment to protecting wild land and issue guidance to developers and local authorities that makes it clear that developments will not be consented where they destroy wild land values.
Stuart Brooks, Chief Executive, John Muir Trust, Tower House, Station Road, Pitlochry.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel