REFORM Scotland claims Government guidance to headteachers on the use of direct funding for schools is too prescriptive.
The right-leaning think tank says that while it backs the introduction of the Pupil Equity Fund (PEF), its goal of empowering headteachers and giving schools more local autonomy risks being undermined.
The scheme provides direct funding to schools to reduce the attainment gap between poorer and better off pupils. This will give headteachers control over spending of around £1,200 per deprived pupil on their roll.
But will operational guidance to schools thwart any attempts at innovation and creativity?
The concern expressed by Reform Scotland is that headteachers are still expected to comply with many local authority processes including accounting procedures.
But this seems reasonable – it is still necessary for schools to be accountable for the way they spend public money. Meanwhile, heads appear to have been involved in shaping the guidance themselves.
What was proposed by the Scottish Government was never the kind of academy schools so prevalent – and criticised in many quarters – in the English education system.
If your starting point is that local authorities are a barrier to educational progress, then the new approach will not meet with approval. But there was never any intention to get rid of local education authorities and they will still be part of the process, whether we like it or not.
There is also a legitimate argument that during the transition to a new system headteachers need time to build their own capacity and that of their school to determine new approaches.
The initiative will not work if ultimately the guidelines do get in the way of local flexibility and block new ideas. But if the systems for administering the PEF are too prescriptive, time will tell. At present, Reform Scotland’s conclusion that this approach will perpetuate a risk-averse and centralist culture seems simply premature.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel