WITH regard to your news item ("Patients wait nearly two years for joint surgery". The Herald, May 27), you state that “waiting times in NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde have soared from 47 days to 60 days”. This must be last year’s waiting time, as in my own experience it is considerably more than 60 days.
I received the obligatory Scottish Government waiting time letter offering surgery within 12 weeks. The 12-week period expired on February 20. Two weeks ago I received a phone call from the orthopaedic surgeon’s secretary, on whose list I was on, informing me I had been transferred, or “dumped” on to the Golden Jubilee Hospital list. I should expect to receive any further communication regarding hip replacement from them. I would probably hear from them in June. This appeared to be the best that could be done.
Thus in my case an initial 12 weeks' wait is of course 84 days; time to day of writing from February, 87 days. So I make that, so far, a waiting time of 171 days. So it would appear to be a waiting time of around 200 days –more than half a year before I get treatment. I suspect I am far from alone in experiencing such delays in treatment which far exceed any waiting times you are quoting. I am no stranger to the system, as I had a hip replaced nine years ago at Gartnavel Hospital which took around six weeks.
The Scottish Government guarantee letter is virtually meaningless.
Eric Flack,
70 Crawford Drive, Glasgow.
I TELEPHONED NHS24 at 8am today (May 29). I had a call back 15 minutes later and a further call back at 8.25am. My details had been sent to the Out of Hours clinic at Stobill Hospital, where I would see a doctor. I left the clinic at Stobhill one hour after arriving having been seen by a doctor and a diagnosis and advice given. I was dealt with courteously and efficiently. I was home by 10.30am.
I’m wondering which politician might use this information in the election campaign?
John Maclean,
32 Bellevue Road, Kirkintilloch.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here