STUART Young (Letters, May 31) explains how the wishes of communities in Scotland on windfarms can be overruled by the Scottish Government. It seems the Government does not listen to anyone who disagrees with ITS views, even one of the largest wildlife charities, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB).
Four offshore windfarms off the coast of Scotland have just been consented after two court cases. The RSPB took the case to the courts because of the acknowledged harm to internationally protected sea birds. Thousands of gannets, puffins and kittiwakes are predicted to die each year. The Government thought the harm acceptable. The Lord Ordinary accepted the Judicial Review and agreed with the RSPB, but the developer went to a higher court where the case was dismissed. Scotland's top judge said: "Despite paying lip service to the correct legal test for judicial review, the Lord Ordinary has strayed well beyond the limits of testing the legality of the process and has turned himself into the decision maker following what appears to have been treated as an appeal against the respondent's decision on the facts.
“He has acted, almost, as if he were the reporter at such an inquiry, as a finder of fact on matters of scientific fact and methodology which whatever the judge's own particular skills may be, are not within the proper province of a court of review.
“For this reason alone, his decision on this ground cannot be sustained."
Section 36 windfarm decisions are not made by parliament and are made by unelected public employees and signed off by ministers. There is no appeal system in which the merits of the case can be considered. I always assumed that one could always refer matters to the courts as wildlife and places are protected by environmental laws, but this proves it is not so.
Where is the possibility of challenging the evidence and enforcing environmental protection under current law?
I hope all RSPB members and others will encourage the society to take this matter to the Supreme, and if necessary, the European Court. Anyone who has been on a boat trip to the Bass Rock to see the gannets, puffins, razorbills and many more seabirds will know that it is one of the wonders of the world. We are custodians of 60 per cent of the world's gannet population and I am ashamed of our Government playing roulette with all these wonderful species.
Celia Hobbs,
Dykeneuk, Peebles Road, Penicuik, Midlothian.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel