WE note the letter (May 20) from the Taipei Representative Office in the UK. The World Health Organisation (WHO) is a specialised agency of the United Nations and an international organisation consisting of sovereign countries which follow the one-China principle. Since Taiwan is part of China, its participation in international organisations should be handled with the one-China principle.
From 2009 to 2016, the central government of China agreed to let the Taiwan region attend the World Health Assembly (WHA) as an observer in the name of "Chinese Taipei" for eight consecutive years, a special arrangement made on the premise of the one-China principle after consensus had been reached through cross-Straits consultations.
Since coming into power in the Taiwan region, the current Taiwan authority has refused to recognise the one-China principle, undermining the political basis of the cross-Straits relations, making the cross-Straits contact and communication mechanism come to a standstill. As a result, the political basis of the Taiwan region's participation in the WHA has ceased to exist while it is impossible to carry out any cross-Straits consultations for the special arrangement any more. Only when the one-China principle is reaffirmed can the regular cross-Straits contacts be continued and the cross-Straits consultations conducted regarding the attendance of the Taiwan region at the WHA.
However, within the framework of the International Health Regulations (2005), there are unimpeded channels and sound mechanism for Taiwan to exchange information with the WHO and countries around the world. Experts from Taiwan can participate in WHO-related technical meetings while the WHO may also send experts to Taiwan for guidance when needed. These arrangements ensure timely and effective responses from Taiwan in case of public health emergencies either in Taiwan or in other places around the world.
Lyu Yanxia,
Spokesperson for the Chinese Consulate General in Edinburgh,
55 Corstorphine Road, Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel