By Mary Anne MacLeod, Research and Policy Officer, A Menu for Change
IT shouldn’t really need to be said, but it is an outrage that in 2017 there are people in Scotland who can’t afford sanitary products. Encouragingly, there has been growing media and political attention on this issue over the past year or so. We have heard shocking reports of people having their health and wellbeing compromised because they don’t have access to these essential items. They include a mum who did not have enough money to pay for maternity pads after she gave birth. It’s an issue that has become known as “period poverty”.
Labour MSP Monica Lennon has launched a consultation for a Member’s Bill at the Scottish Parliament which would see sanitary products provided free in Scotland. The proposal is heralded as an opportunity to “end period poverty”. It comes after the Scottish Government announced funding for a pilot initiative in Aberdeen to provide sanitary products to low-income women through a community initiative which also redistributes surplus food through local partner organisations.
In truth, a variety of community organisations and others have been providing free sanitary products and other basic essentials for some time, reflecting their incredible desire to step in and help people facing urgent, but un-met need. They deserve huge credit for doing so.
As health and women’s rights interventions, these steps are welcome and they should also help relieve some financial pressure for women in poverty. However, caution is needed when framing them as “anti-poverty”. If someone can’t afford to buy sanitary products then it is likely that they also don’t have money for other essentials.
There are parallels here to the response across the UK to the surge in the number of people unable to buy enough food because of low income – a situation driven by insecure, low-paid work and an inadequate benefits system.
In our effort to tackle this “food crisis”, we saw food banks emerge in communities across the country. While again this was a humanitarian response, we became overly distracted from addressing the systemic changes needed to increase people’s incomes.
Food is a basic human right and everyone should have enough money to be able to feed themselves and their families. That’s why our project – A Menu for Change – is seeking to re-focus the response to “food poverty” from emergency food to the prevention of acute income crises and increasing people’s access to the social protection they are entitled to.
This experience should be borne in mind as we grapple with the scandal of “period poverty”. Without a strong and sustained focus on the structural issues which lock people in poverty, targeted initiatives – like the provision of emergency food or sanitary products – will only ever serve as sticking plasters which deal with the symptoms, not the causes of people’s poverty. Women’s health is also a basic human right and so action is needed to address the structural barriers to achieving that right for all, which includes access to sanitary products.
While responding to immediate need is critical, we cannot lose sight of this wider context as to do so would be to forget that in order to end period poverty, just as food poverty, we must focus on ending poverty as a whole. We hope the newly established Poverty and Inequality Commission in Scotland can help lead the way.
Period poverty is one, appalling, indicator of the material deprivation facing the nearly one in five people in Scotland who live in poverty – but ending it demands a sharp focus on the underlying cause: a shortage of money.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel