ALISON Rowat asks: “Is there a doctor in the house who can heal the Tory party?’”(The Herald, September 21). The short answer is: No, there isn’t. It is not a doctor the Tories need but the analyst’s couch, although I suspect most of them are beyond psychoanalysis.
Apart from their apparent political ineptitude, played out weekly in the so-called Brexit “negotiations”, their dysfunctionality is much more deeply-rooted.
It can be found in their distance from the lived experience of ordinary people; their political imperatives are entirely self and party-centred (hence David Cameron’s pursuit of the EU referendum to save the party from the lunacies of Ukip and Theresa May’s foolish decision to call a General Election).
In such a context, policy elements such as prolonged austerity at the expense of the poorest in society, the bedroom tax and the rape clause should cause no surprise.
How can such distance from the lives of ordinary people be explained? Much of it can be understood in the light of the boarding-school experiences which characterise the lives of many of our political leaders and of those in high office in the wider culture which they inhabit.
Children develop survival tactics when separated from their families and removed from the usual patterns of attachment and relationship formation, and these tactics are marked by a hastily-acquired sense of self-reliance and entitlement.
The price they pay is emotional and social dysfunctionality, and scant acquaintance with empathy. The “human” qualities needed to navigate social relationships and to be in touch with the needs of others are depleted or missing. Thus we have Nicola Sturgeon describing Theresa May as “a woman who sits in meetings where it’s just the two of you and reads from a script”(“Sturgeon doubt on timing of new independence vote”, The Herald, September 21).
The Prime Minister’s behaviour following the Grenfell tower tragedy had, of course, provided ample evidence – if it was needed – of her emotional detachment.
The “healing” required, on this analysis, is clearly a very far-reaching re-structuring of the early-life experiences of our “elites” but, in the shorter term, perhaps we should be asking why we elect such people in the first place.
Dr Angus Macmillan,
76 Georgetown Road,
Dumfries.
DR Gerald Edwards calls into question Nicola Sturgeon and the SNP for not giving precise dates for a second referendum on independence (Letters, September 22); in other words holding back on independence
For any political party there are lines in the sand that must not be crossed; fundamental policies that are not up for discussion and, in the SNP’s case, that is independence.
It is disingenuous for Dr Edwards to question the foundation stone on which the SNP stands.
In his letter there is no recognition of the bigger picture – that of Brexit and the position Scotland finds herself in.
It voted remain yet it is being taken out of the EU, excluded from the negotiation table, silenced, without a voice.
With this in mind, is it any wonder the First Minister is holding back on a second referendum? She is the personification of the shrewd politician on this issue.
Catriona C Clark
52 Hawthorn Drive,
Banknock,
Falkirk
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here