THERE are many more implications within the tensions you analyse (“Trump’s Jerusalem announcement likely to inflame Israeli-Palestinian tensions”, The Herald, December 7).

The President’s empty repetition of the increasingly vacuous phrases “two-state solution” and “peace process” needs urgent reappraisal. “Two-state solution” is, frankly, a non sequitor.

Which two states? Israel is a state still undefined in geography by the international community and increasingly defined constitutionally by Israel using the old Testament as the qualifying document.

The government of Israel’s insistence on self-defining as a “Jewish state” is also contentious.

“Palestine” is a “state” (?) bifurcated by geography but more fundamentally split antithetically with pro-Shia Hamas in Gaza in serious conflict with the pro-Sunni Palestinian Authority in the West Bank.

There is in reality no single state called Palestine while the two factions are at loggerheads.

The “peace process” is another political fiction. There can be no process without substantive talks between the parties.

There can be no process while Israel insists on the pre-condition of the recognition of Israel as a distinctive Jewish state.

There can be no peace while Israel imposes land-grabs and assorted injustices on its Arab community.

There can be no hope of peace while Hamas seeks “the destruction” of the state of Israel.

Empty political jargon divorced from reality is of no help in helping to resolve ancient conflicts in the Middle-East.

Thom Cross,

18 Needle Green,

Carluke.

IN November 1967 the United Nations Security Council voted to pass Resolution 242, as proposed by the British Ambassador Lord Caradon, which effectively outlawed the acquisition of territory by an act of war.

This removed any legitimacy Israel might have claimed to have in its control of the area known as the West Bank.

Further resolutions continued in that vein and none was ever rescinded. In other words, Israel has occupied the West Bank illegally since 1967.

In an act of astonishing naivety President Donald Trump has proposed recognising Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and will open an embassy there.

He has effectively stated that Resolution 242 itself has no legitimacy.

This must surely throw doubt upon every resolution passed by the Security Council of the UN.

The question now needing asked is “What validity will current and future resolutions have?”

Indeed, what worth does the parent organisation have, now that its most effective arm has been declared worthless?

R Lang,

9 Braehead,

Douglas.

HOW long is the rest if the world going to let Donald Trump away with his aggressive, violent, imperialistic foreign policy?

He is endangering the rest of the world, putting us at risk of a third world war by threatening to “nuke” countries that don’t do what the US president wants.

The US wants to be isolationist. That means staying within US borders and stop endangering the rest of the world.

Margaret Forbes,

26 Corlic Way,

Kilmacolm.