ON December 10, during the ceremony of awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize, the Director of Ican, Beatrice Fihn, said “through the action of ordinary people, 122 nations negotiated and concluded a UN treaty to outlaw these weapons of mass destruction”. She was referring to the Treaty agreed at the UN on July 7.
These words contradict your report that the treaty was “signed by 56 countries but ratified by only three”. Perhaps you were confusing the signing of the treaty (July7) with the process of ratification, which began in September and is on going. When 50 states have ratified the treaty, it becomes statutory law. To date, 56 nations have ratified it.
Setsuko Thurlow, a hibakusha or survivor of Hiroshima, also spoke at the ceremony. Her words need to be heard by everybody.
“For more than seven decades, we have stood in solidarity with those harmed by the production and testing of these horrific weapons around the world. People from places with long forgotten names, like Moruroa, Ekker, Semipalatinsk, Maralinga, Bikini. People whose lands and seas were irradiated, whose bodies were experimented upon, whose cultures were forever disrupted.
“We were not content to be victims. We refused to wait for an immediate fiery end or the slow poisoning of our world. We refused to sit idly in terror as the so-called great powers took us past nuclear dusk and brought us recklessly close to nuclear midnight ... we said: humanity and nuclear weapons cannot coexist.
“Today, I want you to feel in this hall the presence of all those who perished in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I want you to feel, above and around us, a great cloud of a quarter million souls. Each person had a name. Each person was loved by someone. Let us ensure that their deaths were not in vain”.
You are right, however, to report that the nine rogue nuclear states have said they want nothing to do with this. In the immortal words of Mandy Rice Davies, they would say that, wouldn’t they?
Brian Quail,
2 Hyndland Avenue,
Glasgow .
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel