THERE'S an app for that. Apple's 2009 marketing slogan became such a hit - in the playground, in the office, on the high street - that in 2010 the technology giant trademarked it. You can still banter with it ("My wife's left me, Steve." "There's an app for that.") but you can't use it for commercial purposes.
It's bang on, though. There generally is an app for that. But if you don't have access to the app that will solve your problem, what then?
Passengers, politicians and the general public have been appalled by this week's First Glasgow fare hikes and the company has said it will now think again. Fares for under 16s are to rise by more than 40 per cent while unaccompanied child concessions have bitten the proverbial. Not content with penalising children, First went for another vulnerable group: the unemployed. Unemployed passengers are to be gifted a 10 per cent fare hike, increasing the cost of travel to interviews and to sign on for benefits.
First Glasgow is, of course, a private company with all associated commercial demands. However, despite the fact that it provides a vital public service, the firm seems to have comprehensively failed to take account of the circumstances of the people in the city in which it operates.
The DWP is closing or is to close six Jobcentres across Glasgow, meaning those who need their services will have to travel greater distances, needing two or more buses to get there. It is a city with areas of extreme deprivation and the lowest level of car ownership in Scotland - the bus is vital for people to access local amenities, shop, work, and so on. It has to be affordable.
In the same fare increase announcement, First Glasgow revealed some ticket prices are frozen - but only for the right sort of passenger. The sort who can afford a smart phone and has the savvy - and the patience - to download an app and work out how to use it.
It’s between 25p and £1.50 cheaper to use the mTickets app. (As an aside, can we please stop random capitals and failure to use a capital where a capital should be. It stems from the nonsense of iBook. I blame you, Steve Jobs, and I’m looking at you, sportscotland.)
In response, Graeme Macfarlan, Commercial Director for First Glasgow, said the mTicket app speeds up journeys as people with mobile tickets don't need to hold up other passengers as they faff about for change and wait for a paper ticket to print.
Of course, it used to be that buses were never slowed down by cash transactions as fares were dealt with by the conductor. What has slowed down the boarding process is not customers but job cuts and drivers being expected to take on additional duties.
We're well aware by now of the poverty premium: that people who use pre-payment for gas and electricity pay more; those who can't access best rate bank loans are crooked by payday loans.
Expecting people to have a smartphone is the latest form of poverty premium. Not everyone can afford one, not the upfront cost of the handset or the associated monthly costs.
Some of us just don't want one, don’t want to be tethered to technology.
Firms are constantly bleating at people to download the app. I tried to book an exercise class this week but the website was faulty and the sport centre's phone rang out. "Download the app," I was told. I can't do that because I choose not to have a smartphone.
The shift of necessary services onto mobile technology will only increase. For those of us who stubbornly don't want to pay for a smartphone, tough luck. It's a tax on Luddites.
But there must be solutions for those who are forever priced out of the best deals, whether for want of a bank account, a healthy credit line or the latest mobile phone.
If they can’t do more to level the financial playing field, perhaps the Government should offer subsidised mobile phones to those on low incomes.
Because when it comes to this digital discrepancy, I doubt First will be the last.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here