By Philippa Whitford, SNP MP for Central Ayrshire
WOMEN shouldn’t have to choose between poverty and abuse yet the UK Government is forcing women to do just that.
Universal Credit (UC), the Tories’ flagship welfare policy, is routinely only paid into one bank account per recipient household and charity Women’s Aid is concerned that this could keep women, and to a lesser extent men, trapped in abusive relationships. The worry is also that paying the combined benefits of a couple into a single bank account could impede funds reaching intended beneficiaries such as partners and children, and make financial coercion easier.
Today, on the eve of International Women’s Day, I publish my Universal Credit (Application, Advice and Assistance) Bill which seeks to protect women from financial abuse by introducing routine split payments. It would also compel the UK Government to carry out detailed equality impact assessments of its welfare changes, which it has failed to do despite research showing women have borne the brunt of 86% of the cuts.
Sadly, domestic abuse is rife in the UK with police receiving, on average, 100 calls every hour. Financial abuse is a form of domestic abuse and is estimated to affect one in five women at some point in their lives.
It is used by perpetrators to isolate victims who may have no money to even have a coffee with friends and to keep them financially dependent so that they have no chance of leaving the abusive relationship; half of women in such relationships agreed with the statement, “I don’t have any money of my own so I can’t leave”. Child Poverty Action Group says many women abused by a partner find their finances are controlled as part of the abuse and believes it should be made harder for abusers to appropriate money meant for the family by making split UC payments the norm. The UK Government claims its alternative payment arrangements, which allow abused partners to apply for split payments in exceptional circumstances, deals with this but few women are aware of the option and 85% of domestic abuse survivors who spoke to Women’s Aid said applying for split payments would anger their partner and make the abuse worse. Split payments should be made the default.
The UK Government has been warned repeatedly that joint payments could exacerbate financial abuse and yet it persists with single payments. In answer to my recent Parliamentary Question, the Department for Work and Pensions said: “As employers pay employees and do not divide salary payments amongst households, the UC payment arrangements mirror that.”
This response makes the assumption that only one person in each household is employed; the notion of the “breadwinner” is like being transported back to the 1950s, where this policy belongs. If both partners are working, they would not expect their employer to insist their salaries be paid to one person. This outdated model is detrimental to the progress of women’s equality and is characteristic of a government woefully out of touch with society.
The policy also flies in the face of research showing that, if monies associated with childcare are paid to the primary carers, most commonly women, the funds are more likely to be spent on the children. The UK Government should not persist with policies that put vulnerable women and children in danger, allowing them to be financially deprived or abused when a simple amendment could provide protection.
Dr Whitford is the party’s Westminster spokeswoman on health.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here