By Eric Curran, Managing partner of chartered surveyors DM Hall
RECENT media commentary from usually well-informed sources have raised the so far unresolved but familiar concerns about the supply of affordable property in Scotland, especially in our major cities, for first-time buyers.
Typical are the complaints that home ownership is increasingly out of reach, with young people expected to save large deposits to access mortgage finance and the need to make housing more affordable by building more homes of all tenures – for ownership, shared ownership, private rent, mid-market and social rent.
The reality, however, is that private developers are driven by public demand for property and their aim is to make profit. Competition between the developers for limited land suitable for development keeps land values high and ultimately the cost of land becomes part of the pricing structure of completed homes.
Developers have tried, too, in recent years to find ways of making properties “affordable” for the public by using shared equity schemes, incentives, part exchange and so on and the authorities have aided this by help to buy schemes funded by the Scottish Government. It is debatable if any of the above makes property “affordable” or if they simply make it easier for people to purchase.
Construction costs are fairly transparent but the fact remains that funding construction is difficult for developers if borrowings are required and public money is under great pressure from many sectors therefore not necessarily available to fund housing projects to meet the volume expectations. Availability of land is restricted, competition keeps pricing high and often planning policy is not helpful. If the expensive land cost is to be reduced in the pricing of housing then land has to be made available at a different cost base. Brownfield sites may also offer part of the solution but only if free from contamination and in the right location.
There are no easy answers here: renting makes it difficult for many to raise a deposit and often traps them in the profit-making private rented sector. Challenging markets throughout the economy as well, perhaps, as low levels of productivity, keep profit margins low and tend to restrict the money available for general salary increases. For every highly publicised organisation that makes “super profits” there are thousands of businesses that fight to keep the doors open, but these are the silent majority.
A significant change would be required from the Scottish Government and public sector authorities to help solve the “affordable housing” problems because if nothing else it has been shown that private developers cannot deliver the number of properties required to meet demand at the desired level of pricing.
An added problem is the limited skill set available to builders to accommodate a significant increase in building projects. Education has to take a good look at what it is delivering: vocational education seems to have taken a back seat for a long time and trades are suffering from the skilled labour shortages that would be required to sustain a significant increase in construction. There is little point in demanding more housing if the labour force is not available to build them.
The property market and property prices are, in essence, the result of supply and demand. This is, perhaps, a little simplistic but generally true. The influences in the market can often be analysed down to supply and demand but at the point of new build or conversion for sale, profit is understandably a driving factor for the construction industry and results in higher pricing.
Limited supply, high demand, poor investment returns on traditional investment vehicles and competition are some of the many influencing factors that drive our property market pricing. To state that the property market is failing first-time buyers is rather simplistic when describing the rather complicated entity known as Scotland’s “property market”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here