AS usual, the weekend provided no respite from the question of Brexit and “the will of the people”. It appears from recent polling that more than 100 Leave-voting constituencies now would vote to Remain, meaning that this “will” may have substantially changed as the disastrous consequences become ever clearer, but a chance to demonstrate this in a vote of the people is still no nearer.
I have in the past expressed my belief that the referendum was manipulated by the exclusion of many who have committed their future to the UK – EU citizens living here permanently – and the inclusion of many who have abandoned this country, gone abroad and will be unaffected by the consequences. I might add the anomaly that of the four nations of the UK, and one overseas territory – Gibraltar – three voted Remain but were overruled simply on the basis of raw population numbers.
I expect to hear the usual cries of “we are one country” and “Scots voted to stay in the UK”, but by a small margin. I suggest that the argument that a No vote was the only way to stay in the EU was extremely influential and of prime importance to many. For Remain then to have won by such a huge margin must surely prove that a) Scots think it more important to remain in the EU than in the UK and b) that many No voters, influenced by that Unionist promise, when it was broken, found their reason for staying in the UK was gone. They therefore changed their vote to uphold their original views. Some Yes voters voted to leave, and so, for the substantial margin for Remain, a very large number must have had EU membership as their objective in both referenda.
I believe that Scots have twice made clear their view that EU membership is of prime importance to our future, even over the maintenance of the Union. Yet our views have been totally ignored and all past promises broken. The will of the people?
P Davidson,
Gartcows Road, Falkirk.
I SUGGEST that all those who are legitimately concerned by the spectacle of Steve Bannon “schooling far-right movements across Europe [being] in touch with Mr Johnson in recent weeks” start to seriously contemplate the prospects of the apparent post cliff-edge Brexit far-right coup which is being planned by the Extreme Brexiters (“Boris Johnson would be ‘great Prime Minister’, says former Trump adviser Steve Bannon”, your front page 13 August).
Not only do we have the Johnson/Bannon links but we have the unsavoury relationship between Liam Fox and his American colleagues, from his Atlantic Bridge days, determined to convert our entire unregulated society (especially the NHS) into a totally open market to be plundered by the US corporate sector. Atlantic Bridge was a think-tank for the movers and shakers of the hard right founded by DR Fox himself.
I cannot understand why Jacob Rees-Mogg, who is so passionate about the UK “recovering its sovereignty”, is saying nothing about his Brexit collaborators’ intentions. If we have to share our sovereignty with others, which I believe to be inevitable, I would rather do so with Europe rather than with America, particularly a Trumpite America.
John Milne,
9 Ardgowan Drive, Uddingston.
LINDSAY Brydon regards George Cunningham's effective tactics prior to the 1979 referendum as "an infamous footnote in Scottish political history" (Herald Obituary, August 11), an opinion which, like many expressed on the Letters Pages, takes a selective view of the democratic process.
Cunningham employed established procedure to achieve his desired outcome while those seeking separation from the United Kingdom pick and choose which votes to accept as binding, their reactions following the 2014 "once in a lifetime" referendum and Brexit being exemplary.
Duncan Macintyre,
2 Fort Matilda Terrace, Greenock.
TODAY (August 13) you publish another letter from Iain AD Mann complaining in general terms yet again about Theresa May and Brexit and calling yet again for Scotland to be independent. Whilst he is of course perfectly entitled to hold these views with which I disagree, may I remind him simply that in his previous letter published recently on these same topics I took some comfort from the fact that he ended that letter by stating "I rest my case". So be it, please.
Alan Fitzpatrick,
10 Solomon’s View, Dunlop
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here