It’s been a good week for ... veg
US researchers have come up with a new way to encourage people to eat vegetables: make them sexy. A team at Stanford tested their theory on students in the university cafeteria and found veggie sales went up by 25 per cent when indulgent labels were used.
The results showed that “sizzlin’ beans”, “dynamite beets” and “twisted citrus-glazed carrots” tempted diners to tuck in. But healthy labels such as “wholesome” were a turn-off, even though the dishes were identical.
Brad Turnwald, who led the research team, says the findings make sense when you consider the psychology behind food choices.
“When most people are making a dining decision, they are motivated by taste. And studies show that people tend to think of healthier options as less tasty for some reason.”
Steamy hot cabbage, anyone? Tantalising turnips?
Perhaps our Scottish favourites don’t lend themselves quite so well to culinary seduction.
It’s been a bad week for ... fruit
A survey on children’s attitude to food has turned up some alarming findings. The British Nutrition Foundation (BNF) poll to mark its Healthy Eating Week last week found that 11 per cent of 11-16-year-olds thought fruit pastilles counted towards their five-a-day, while around a quarter thought they could include strawberry jam as part of their daily fruit and veg intake.
Nearly one-third (29 per cent) of five to seven-year-olds and nearly a quarter of older primary pupils thought cheese came from a plant, not an animal.
Just over 22 per cent of infants and 13 per cent of older primary pupils believed that pasta comes from animals. Some 22 per cent of five to seven-year-olds also said prawns come from plants and 20 per cent thought chips were made of animals.
Meanwhile, nearly one in five young children believes fish fingers are made from chicken, although this last nugget fails to surprise since fish fingers were invented to fool children into eating fish, a cunning ruse that seems to have backfired.
Even the humble tomato caused confusion, with around 11 per cent of 11 to16-year-olds believing that they grow underground.
Oh well ... you say tomato, I say potato.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here