WHEN your area has an unemployment rate of 17%, and 60% of its people have no car, the last news you want to hear is that your rail service to the nearest major city may be axed. Which is why, in April 1984, 400 residents of Patterton and Neilston, in Renfrewshire, crowded onto a train to Glasgow Central, from where, led by three pipers, they marched to the HQ of Strathclyde Regional Council. The authority had threatened to close rail services between Glasgow and the communities as part of a package to cut rate-borne subsidies and extend rail electrification to East Kilbride and Cumbernauld. A delegation told the council’s highways and transportation chairman, Malcolm Waugh, of the social and economic hardships that would face the 5,000-strong community if the closure went ahead. They argued that the consequences ought to have been taken into account before the package was agreed, pointed out that buses were no real alternative to the train, and said that 300 pupils would have to be bussed daily to and from Eastwood Secondary School if the service came to an end. Mr Waugh said he would meet them in two months’ time once they had given him their report on proposed alternatives to closure. He also said that if the council ended the subsidy for the Neilston/Patterton service, it would be up to the Secretary of State for Transport to decide whether or not to actually axe it.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here