It's been a good week for … the urban jungle
A LAIDBACK country life is often heralded as the utopian dream, but a new study is claiming to deftly turn that notion on its head.
According to Dr Jeanette Bicknell from York University in Toronto, urban dwellers enjoy more life satisfaction than their rural counterparts.
Dr Bicknell found that fast-paced cities such as London and New York fuel contentment among their residents who profess to feeling like they make better use of their time than those with a more leisurely tempo of life. In short, being busy is viewed as a "badge of honour".
Yet, something rings a tad hollow. Secret to happiness? Nah. More like using a full diary to divert from an empty life …
It's been a bad week for … children's books
A LEADING author has expressed dismay that modern children's books are being "sanitised".
Geraldine McCaughrean – awarded the CILIP Carnegie Medal for her novel, Where the World Ends, last week – suggested that the genre has undergone a major dumbing down with a range of topics no longer deemed suitable for younger readers.
She said: "With a book that's going to be sold into schools you get a list of things that are unacceptable – no witches, no demons, no alcohol, no death, no religion. It really does cut down what you can write about."
McCaughrean, who has penned more than 160 books, added: "It's extraordinary because in pre-school you can read fairy tales in their original form and some of them are really scary and dark.
"But you go to junior school and all of a sudden the fairy tales that you read in school have been sanitised and cleaned up."
She makes an excellent point. Our moral compass can be shaped by the books we read in our formative years. Wrapping kids up in cotton wool does little to instil a pivotal sense of good and bad.
Next there will be demands that the CS Lewis classic be re-named as The Lion, the Nice Old Lady and the Wardrobe.
Or insisting that the wolf in Little Red Riding Hood didn't eat Grandma, but rather whisked her out for a lovely vegan afternoon tea.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here