IN the aftermath of a tragedy, where the loss of life could have been prevented, those who mourn are overwhelmed by unanswered questions.
The Fatal Accident Inquiry into the deaths of 14 elderly residents at Rosepark Care Home in Uddingston has been harrowing for their relatives, the staff who cared for them and the fire fighters who attempted to rescue them from the burning building seven years ago. Its findings, however, provide answers to the questions that must be asked if similar disasters are to be avoided.
Sheriff Principal Brian Lockhart’s detailed inquiry has uncovered a catalogue of failures that must prompt all those providing residential care to re-examine their own risk assessments and safety procedures.
Like most such events, it is clear, with the benefit of hindsight, that Rosepark was an accident waiting to happen.
Its catastrophic scale, however, was due to a series of omissions, lax practice and misunderstandings, on the part of regulatory bodies as well as the owners of the home, which combined with fatal consequences.
The abject failure by Thomas Balmer, the owner of the home, to address the risk of a fire breaking out or how to evacuate elderly residents is genuinely shocking.
A fire would be problematic enough during the day but the prospect of getting frail, confused and disabled people out of bed in the middle of the night is so fraught with difficulty that it must be an essential part of staff training.
Yet not one of the four members of staff on duty in the early hours of January 31, 2004, had ever been on a fire drill.
They and the fire fighters were further hampered by wrong information on the building’s fire zones which had never been put to the test.
The professionals on the scene were forced to blunder their way through a situation in which the difference between life and death depends on clear heads and competence.
The owners of the home must carry the main burden of responsibility but the omission of fire safety inspections by both Lanarkshire Health Board and the Care Commission on the wrong assumption that this was the duty of the fire and rescue service amounts to a serious failure to ask basic questions.
The sorrow they felt by the families of those who died will have been compounded by the emergence of the signal failure by individuals at every level to make residents’ safety the priority.
The only comfort they can salvage is that lessons have already been, and will continue to be, learned.
The inspection regime must ensure that is the case in every home that claims to care.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article