ALEX Salmond's speech to the SNP spring conference in Glasgow yesterday revealed the scale of the challenges and paradoxes he faces on the road to the independence referendum.
On one level, the First Minister's pitch was a simple one to voters on the eve of the local elections.
He provided a list of achievements and policies, including a reheated pledge on 600 hours a year of free nursery education, which the SNP's candidates can now dutifully recite on doorsteps.
There was a natural emphasis on Glasgow, given the city council is the party's top target in May. Wresting control of the city chambers from Labour would turbo-charge the SNP's independence bandwagon.
But the other tier of Salmond's speech was more intriguing, and potentially more difficult for him.
It was his fledgling argument that Scotland is already quasi-independent in some regards, notably in Holyrood's control over the health service, school and higher education, and the justice system.
These "measures of independence" have allowed the SNP to take Scotland in a different direction to England by spurning the privatisation of public services relished by the Tories, Salmond argued.
Imagine, he went on, what a beacon of social justice Scotland could become if it was wholly, not simply partially, independent.
From Salmond's repeated use of this idea, and Nicola Sturgeon's expected return to it today in her conference speech, it is clear that the SNP intend to promote independence as a natural and painless extension of Holyrood's powers.
Numerous bland speeches yesterday which lauded Britishness, the monarchy, and Scotland's intense neighbourly love of England also sought to reassure the 20% of voters who will decide the outcome of the referendum.
What, many old SNP hands must wonder, happened to the passion?
How did the most enormous, extraordinary decision in Scotland's modern history become a relentless exercise in triangulation and message management?
Therein lies Salmond's central conundrum.
Independence would mean seismic change for Scotland, a decisive constitutional break with the past and the cornerstone, for good or ill, of a wholly new future.
The First Minister knows it – and desires it. But to get there, he has chosen to downplay its magnitude to avoid alarming swing voters.
And in so doing he may leave some in his party – and the country – unsure of what he stands for.
Balancing these competing demands is a hard political test, but if anyone can do it, Salmond can.
The local elections will be an early indication of whether the soft sell is working. If Glasgow falls, then the hopes of the independence movement will rise.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article