Every January, historians, journalists and members of the public are treated to the release of historical government files.
Such a process is clearly in the public interest – disclosure shines a light onto key government decisions of yesteryear and helps separate fact from fiction.
However, a cross-Border row has now been triggered over when sensitive files of previous administrations should be published.
For the UK Government, files are transferred to the National Archives after 30 years – it will be reduced to 20 this year.
For the Scottish Government, which manages the pre-devolution files of the old Scottish Office, a more liberal 15-year rule applies.
Under this regime, the last Labour government's devolution files from 1997 should have been released last week. They were not.
This is because UK officials halted their publication after requesting an inspection of the documents.
It is not difficult to imagine why the Scotland Office may be nervous. Publication of the files is expected to reveal how former Cabinet ministers tried to water down Donald Dewar's devolution prospectus. The revelations would no doubt give the SNP ammunition ahead of next year's referendum.
Given that Scottish devolution was a radical policy, it is natural and inevitable that Cabinet figures would express robust opinions behind closed doors.
The anxiety over the proposed release may be understandable, but effectively blocking it was the wrong move. Instead of accepting a limited amount of fallout from the publication of the files, the Scotland Office has given the impression there is something to hide.
The episode also exposes the inconsistent attitude to transparency of both governments, with the SNP taking a liberal approach to openness when it come to information about previous administrations, but not to itself.
For instance, the Scottish Government's attitude towards freedom of information was rightly mocked when ministers refused to say whether they had taken legal advice on an independent Scotland's relationship with the European Union.
Openness and transparency, so often trumpeted as goals of successive governments, are too important to be undermined by political manipulation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article