We have been here before.
Better-than-expected growth statistics following on from a period of slump are encouraging, but by no means the end of uncertainty. It has been a long, slow tramp through the economic gloom, but is the UK finally emerging into the sunlit uplands of prosperity or could this be yet another false dawn?
A closer look at the drivers of growth in the last quarter perhaps offers some clues. It is encouraging that the huge service sector has grown by 0.6%, with a particularly strong showing by hotels and restaurants. This would tend to suggest consumers are feeling sufficiently confident about the future to splash out more.
Still, other vital sectors of the economy remain in the doldrums, with construction falling 2.5% in the first quarter, and manufacturing and exports barely improving; all in all, the signs of recovery are far from comprehensive.
What is more, yesterday's figure of 0.3% growth in the first three months of 2013 is merely a preliminary snapshot, an early estimate that will be subject to further revision when more data becomes available (though it does chime in with positive Scottish GDP growth figures for the last quarter of 2012, released last week).
Given the wafer thin numbers, it is no surprise they have been given such a cautious welcome by ministers who fear the apparent signs of recovery might once again be a mirage. A triple-dip recession, though now less likely, is still possible.
In spite of that, George Osborne and David Cameron will sleep just a little more easily in their beds following this latest fillip. They and their supporters will hope it will go some way to mollifying critics of their severe austerity programme, including the International Monetary Fund, which recently called in the Chancellor to relax his £130 billion package of spending cuts.
That is likely to be a vain hope. When Mr Osborne embarked upon the current programme of cuts three years ago it was with the stated overall aim of reducing the country's budget deficit, which had grown to the point where it threatened the UK's precious AAA credit rating. Three years on, progress on reducing the deficit has stalled and Britain has been downgraded by two credit ratings agencies anyway, in spite of the pitiless austerity programme.
Even though there has been a slight upturn in GDP in the first three months of this year, a loosening of fiscal constraints is required to help coax this weak flame into a blaze; Mr Osborne must heed those calls if he does not want his stubborn approach to be discredited for a third time by sliding GDP figures a few months from now.
Given all of that, the Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls is right to call it like it is, highlighting that the economy has effectively been flatlining for three years, but he and his Labour colleagues also have a responsibility not to talk away consumer confidence by adopting the mantle of doomsayers to score political points.
There is a chance the UK economy could finally be turning the corner and it is incumbent on politicians of all parties to handle this fragile potential recovery with the greatest care.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article