The Scottish Parliament had four guiding principles when it was created in 1999:
openness; accountability; sharing of power; equal opportunities. On openness, Holyrood has largely lived up to aspirations. However, blindspots still exist.
Cross-party groups, like their equivalent at Westminster, are a worthwhile way of bringing politicians and external bodies together to raise issues of common concern.
But there is a difference between companies and individuals being part of a cross-party group and commercial interests helping with the organisation of such groups.
As we reveal today, a businesswoman with links to the pharmaceutical industry provides the secretariat for the groups on health inequalities and chronic pain.
There is no suggestion of impropriety - Jacquie Forde has said she carries out the work as an individual and on a voluntary basis - but the case raises important questions about the role of outside individuals and bodies on cross-party groups.
The wider issue is that the efforts of the public affairs groups, charities and others in trying to influence Holyrood remain unregulated.
After pressure from Labour MSP Neil Findlay, the Scottish Government agreed to introduce legislation on "lobbying transparency", an issue now being looked at by the Parliament's Standards Committee.
We believe the solution is clear. Not only should there be a statutory register of commercial lobbyists - including standalone firms and in-house practitioners - but they should also have to reveal details of clients and of their approaches to MSPs, ministers and civil servants.
In other words, there needs to be a register of lobbyists and of lobbying. At that point, the Holyrood Parliament will be able to call itself a model of openness and accountability.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article