FOR those who saw it, it was unforgettable.
For those who didn't, it is best avoided.
Last week's STV debate between Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon and Scottish Labour leader Johann Lamont was abysmal.
Although the adversarial format was partly to blame, the sight of two of Scotland's most senior politicians continually shouting over one another to produce a meaningless din was a new low for the independence referendum.
While Yes and No diehards may have cheered their respective champion, undecided voters tuning in for information and enlightenment must have been appalled at what was on offer.
There was no attempt to debate, only needle, plus noise and efforts to drown out the opposing view.
Both sides quickly realised it was not their finest hour, but by then the damage was done.
There are now 200 days until we cast the most important vote of our lifetime. This weekend, politicians from all parties are using the milestone to urge people to consider what a Yes or No would mean to them, their families and their country.
But instead of asking us to reflect, it is the politicians who should look at themselves and ask what they need to do to improve the basis for that historic decision.
Right now, they are applying abrasive election campaign tactics to an event that demands to be treated far more sensitively and cannily.
The large number of undecided voters points to a hunger for clear information that is not being met by endless claim and counter-claim.
By refusing to pre-negotiate elements of an independence settlement, a tactic designed to keep as many question marks in the air as possible, Westminster is partly culpable.
But so is the SNP when it flatly refuses to accept almost everything the unionist parties say.
The SNP may be right that rejecting a formal currency union would be perverse for the rest of the UK, but if the rest of the UK accepts the consequences it is not impossible. It is simplistic to discount it as pure bluff.
This is undoubtedly a hard cycle to break.
September 18 is a binary choice between Yes and No, passions are already high, and the tribal divide between the opposing sides runs deep.
Both those campaigning in the referendum must aim to win the peace as well as the war.
They must beware sowing a bitter legacy.
In less than a fortnight, the parties start to hold their spring conferences.
It is a chance for a different approach. For the side that stops treating the referendum as another election scrap, that stops the knee-jerk denials and instant attacks - that starts, in other words, to exhibit maturity and balance - the rewards could be great.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article