The fingernails could catch on.
Eddie Izzard yesterday brought colour and panache to the referendum debate, which has so far been a grey discussion about statistics, treaties and export figures and has left many voters disengaged as a result.
His flamboyant talons, painted as the Union Jack and the EU flag, are not something ever likely to be sported by Alistair Darling, Willie Rennie or even Annabel Goldie (though one never knows) but they may catch the public imagination. When it comes to engaging voters, nail varnish may speak louder than Treasury reports.
Two questions arise from the comedian's visit: will it help boost Better Together's fortunes? And does it improve the quality of the debate to have celebrities, especially those who cannot vote in the referendum, campaigning for either side?
Only the polls will show whether Izzard has helped the pro-UK cause, but his comments prior to the gig demonstrated a marked shift away from hardline issue-bashing, even though Izzard, a fearsomely bright and seasoned political campaigner, could almost certainly have tackled them if he chose. Instead, he referenced the bloody medieval conflicts between England and Scotland, and noted that it was "beautiful" to have reached a position of being together. He stressed that "we are all the same people", a sense heightened for him by running multiple marathons around the UK for Sport Relief. It was a simple, heartfelt, positive message of the sort that has been woefully lacking from the No camp. Is this the magic formula that will move the masses? Even a professional pollster with a sideline in astrology would struggle to predict that, but with warnings about the risks of independence leaving many key voters cold, this change of pitch from Better Together is to be expected.
Does it trivialise the debate to have it fronted by celebrities? Izzard, it must be said, is no political lightweight, with his long history of Labour party support; he has spoken seriously of standing for office. In a nation of monoglots, arguably anyone who can perform a gig in French and German (Izzard passionately believes humour transcends frontiers) deserves respect. All UK residents, famous or otherwise, will be affected by the outcome of the referendum and have the right to voice their opinion. That does not mean, though, that Scottish voters will pay them any attention.
A certain amount depends, of course, on what a celebrity has to say - and how they say it. There is certainly a crying need for more comedy in what has so far been a humour-free zone. Susan Calman and Rory Bremner have dipped their toes in the water, as if into a pool of piranha, and been chastened by the experience, while Billy Connolly has decided to steer well clear. And they are all Scots. So Izzard, a self-professed "Englishman called Edward", certainly has guts.
Voters are highly unlikely to be swayed merely by the say so of a celebrity, nor should they be, but if Izzard's visit marks a shift into more positive campaigning by Better Together, then he is doing the whole debate a favour.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article