The sight of Jim Murphy, the Labour MP who has been travelling round Scotland making the case for a No vote on September 18, being targeted by an angry crowd was unpleasant, but does it really indicate a sinister turn in the campaign?
Mr Murphy believes so and has claimed that his speaking tour, 100 Towns in 100 Days, has fallen foul of what he calls organised street mobbery, co-ordinated, he believes, by Yes Scotland.
In response, Alex Salmond, the First Minister, has rejected Mr Murphy's concerns and has called on Scots to ignore what he calls the Labour MP's "wind-ups", although he has also made it clear that he condemns intimidation of any kind.
A spokesman for Yes Scotland has underlined the message by saying that there is no place for abuse in the campaign and both sides of the debate should treat others with respect at all times.
Hopefully, such public statements from Yes Scotland will help maintain calm, although from the start, the independence debate has sometimes had the tendency to turn toxic and aggressive, usually on the internet. The so-called cybernats appear to be more numerous and high profile than their pro-UK counterparts but both sides have been guilty on occasion and both sides have a responsibility to control it as much as they can. There should be no hint of encouraging the nastier elements to turn on their opponents, however tempting it may be.
There is certainly nothing wrong with voters shouting or booing and making their feelings known, as they did during the recent television debates between Mr Salmond and Alistair Darling, the leader of Better Together, but when it becomes abuse or intimidation, it has to be discouraged by the leaders of both campaigns. They should always do their best to encourage their supporters to behave in a responsible and reasonable manner.
The most obvious danger of allowing the abuse to escalate, online or on the streets, is that those who would otherwise contribute to the referendum debate will give up and keep quiet rather than be shot down in flames. And that is not healthy for the wider debate.
It is this danger that is apparently worrying some in the No campaign who have expressed their concern that an overly vehement atmosphere at polling stations on September 18 could discourage some people from voting. Mr Darling is having talks with the police later this week on the matter, although the leadership of Police Scotland know a higher than normal turn-out is expected and are said to have plans in place.
It is obviously impossible to say how likely intimidation or abuse on polling day is, but passions will be running high on the day on both sides and no one should feel intimidated when they go to vote, whether they are casting their vote for the UK or for independence. Yes Scotland and Better Together must do all they can to help maintain calm at the polling stations on one of the most important days in Scotland's history.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article