THE problems on Scotland’s trains are well known to anyone who has to rely on them and many others who have been forced into their cars because of the state of the service: the over-crowding at peak times, the lack of punctuality, and the fact that all the promised improvements have been ¬ rather like the trains themselves ¬ slow to arrive.
And then there are the fares, which can be confusing, inconsistent and far too high for the level of service offered. Take the case of Stuart Gray. Mr Gray knows what he is talking about on trains – not only is he a member of the Scottish Railway Preservation Society, he is a regular traveller between Drumry and Edinburgh, and recently he has noticed a discrepancy in the fares. Using a senior railcard, he pays £20.05 for an anytime day return, but a passenger doing a similar journey from nearby will pay £3.55 less.
Mr Gray says he is struggling to get his head round the lack of logic but it is not the only inconsistency in the fares that are charged across the network. Passengers in some parts of Scotland will pay much more per mile than others; there are also kinks in the system that mean two passengers making the same journey will pay widely varying prices.
These inconsistencies need ironed out, but it is only one part of the bigger problem. Earlier this month, the transport minister Humza Yousaf announced a free week for monthly and annual season ticket holders, which was sold to them as a thank-you for their patience during the recent disruption and upgrades.
However, what the free week is in reality is a tacit admission of the current parlous state of the service. When Abellio took over the ScotRail franchise last year, it promised all kinds of improvements to the trains, the services and the fares. More than a year on, passengers like Mr Gray know the truth. The delivery of the improvements is now well overdue.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel