FOR months now, Theresa May has faced pressure to lay out the details of her approach to Brexit, but so far, the response has been vague and evasive – the government will not provide a “running commentary”, she says. Now a speech due tomorrow could finally provide some more clues – the problem is that it also looks likely to be a signal that the Prime Minister is heading in the wrong direction.
Her priority, it would seem, is immigration – in fact, so determined is Mrs May to achieve control over migration into the UK that she appears willing to sacrifice its membership of the single market and the customs union. In other words, to appease the right-wing of the Brexit argument, the Prime Minister will, in the end, go for a hard Brexit.
Seen from her own narrow perspective, the decision makes some sense, as concern over immigration drove much of the Leave vote. But if, as expected, tomorrow’s speech is the first sign that the PM is prepared to push the UK into a hard Brexit, it is also a sign she is willing to ignore the damage leaving the single market will do to the British economy. There must also be some doubt that she has properly considered the potentially serious consequences for the future of the UK and Scotland – or perhaps she is simply willing to take the risky choice of calling Nicola Sturgeon’s bluff.
On the economy, we can see that some of the damage has already been done, with the uncertainty over Brexit casting a pall over growth. Prices are rising, wages are stagnating and growth for next year is likely to be barely above one per cent. The Scottish business community has also made it clear that it lacks confidence in the Brexit process. After years of struggle, Brexit is an added weight round the neck of the economy.
The idea that the UK Government would pursue a hard Brexit in the face of Scotland’s vote to remain in the EU is also a bad omen for the long-term health of devolution. The single market guarantees freedom of movement of people, which Scotland needs more than the rest of the UK, and yet Mrs May seems to see an end to freedom of movement as the be all and end all.
The UK Government has also looked wary of any special deal for Scotland, even though greater freedom of movement would be one way to help an economy that is increasingly imbalanced by an ageing population and dragged down by the state of the oil and gas industry. Scotland needs immigrants, but for the sake of the more extreme Brexiters, the Prime Minister seems prepared to slam the door on them.
If there is a glimmer of hope, it is that as long as Mrs May has not definitively said where her government is heading, there is still some prospect of a more mature, collaborative deal. However, the background music is increasingly sounding like it has been composed by the more extreme Euro-sceptics rather than more moderate voices that can see the need for a bespoke arrangement for Scotland.
The watch word of the Brexit negotiations should be compromise. Instead, it is increasingly looking like the British Government is prepared to dogmatically pursue a hard Brexit, with almost all of us paying the price.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel