CHANGING the way any system works is often unpopular, frequently challenging. But there is an additional pressure with education reforms, in that failure to fix any problem risks harming the chances of individual pupils in ways which may have long-term consequences.
Thus there is a degree of urgency about addressing the flaws in the National 4 and National 5 qualifications in schools. This arises, primarily from a need to make the former qualification more appealing – to pupils, parents and employers.
Because many pupils currently take the National 5 who are not suited to the qualification, a quarter of those who emerge from schools with a National 4 qualification do so having “failed” to gain a National 5 award. Teachers’ union the Educational Institute of Scotland says this is creating an educational “apartheid” within schools.
The solution, most within and outwith schools agree, is to include an exam element to the assessment of the Nat 4, to help build confidence in it as a sensible choice for many pupils, rather than a lesser qualification.
But the Scottish Qualifications Authority has now made it clear that it will not be able to take on the job of devising such an exam, what to assess and how to deliver it until its current work has concluded.
This is an unacceptable delay, according to the EIS, which believes a qualification could be put in place with minimal fuss. It is arguable whether deferring this work until after the summer really is a delay, given that there has never been an official timetable for bringing in changes to the Nat 4.
But it is certainly concerning when teachers are warning of division and even of some pupils being forced to drop out.
These reforms are vital to prevent that happening, to restore faith in the system and ultimately to ensure pupils can get the best out of the suite of qualifications on offer under Curriculum for Excellence. All those involved: ministers, the SQA and teachers’ bodies must come together as soon as possible to resolve this extremely unpalatable situation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here