LAST October, when the Royal Botanic Garden in Edinburgh (RBGE) tried quietly closing much-loved Inverleith House as a full-time arts venue, howls of protest shattered the peace in its Arcadian domain. Leading cultural figures decried the move; an online petition gained 10,000 signatures; bloggers declared war on what they saw as unaccountable managers putting accountancy before culture.
Subsequently, a working party comprised of leading cultural figures was established to examine a viable artistic future for the 18th- century building. It presented its findings yesterday and, happily, these offer a confident prognosis.
Citing inspiring examples of exhibitions at the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew and the New York Botanical Garden, the report also suggests a range of possibilities such as seasonally-themed programmes, residencies pairing artists with scientists, architectural programmes, “pop-up” gardens, partnerships with universities. And they do this with one eye on the public purse, believing there is untapped potential for sponsorship.
There is also an implicit suggestion that, despite the financial challenges faced by the arts, RBEG is better placed than many. While it is true the primary focus of a botanical garden is horticultural, Inverleith House has become a key arts venue linking art and floriculture. This report suggests it can remain so.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article