Scotland's active role in British colonialism has been well documented, and the often troubling and shameful repercussions of the UK's Empire building are, perhaps, in need of a more thoughtful and honest public reckoning.
And therefore when, on the face of it, a reasonable request for repatriation of materials taken from a foreign country in the 19th century is made, Scotland should take notice.
In the case of the Beothuk people, the materials in question are the remains of two bodies of indigenous people from Newfoundland.
Canada, through its heritage minister, has already notified the National Museums of Scotland of the nation's intention to ask for the repatriation of the bodies, which came into the possession of first the University of Edinburgh, and then the Museum, in the Victorian era.
The remains are not on display, and although the Museum contends they are of the utmost scientific importance, it seems reasonable to expect these bodies can be be either studied competently in Canada, or laid to rest with due respect to their indigenous history, in their homeland.
In 1999, Glasgow returned a Ghost Dance Shirt to the Sioux people of South Dakota, recognising the importance of such items both for their people, and as a way of acknowledging that, more than 200 years after the Victorian age's conquest and assumption of European cultural dominance, times and attitudes have thankfully changed.
In the month when Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau visits Edinburgh, perhaps returning the Beothuk remains would be a timely gesture to both the past, and the future.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel