ANIMAL welfare is an emotive subject but one that is also amenable to reason. Accordingly, it is reasonable now to consider whether the maximum sentence for animal cruelty is sufficient. A growing number of people believe it is not.
In Scotland, the maximum jail sentence is one year. In Ireland and Northern Ireland, it is five years and, indeed, the evidence is clear that Scotland is lagging behind the rest of the world in this regard. In Germany and France, the maximum sentence is two and three years respectively; in Latvia five years; Finland four years; Queensland, Australia, seven years; Connecticut and Louisiana, in the US, 10 years.
We are not obliged to follow the example of others for its own sake, but it is becoming clear that our current “deterrent” does not deter and that it is disproportionately lenient – where it is implemented at all. The Scottish SPCA has found few sheriffs use, or are able to use, the maximum sentence. Last year, the charity’s many investigations resulted in just three jail sentences.
Yesterday, on the day Ayrshire pet shelter operator Zara Brown was given a seven-month sentence for horrific treatment of animals in her care, the Scottish SPCA called for a maximum jail sentence of five years. It is 11 years since the Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act came into force. A review of its sentencing powers would now seem only reasonable.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here