I AGREE with much of Colette Douglas Home's shrewd comments on the Pope's resignation ("Was this when RC church entered the modern world?", The Herald, February 12).
As she correctly observes – after classifying the papal job description as chairman, monarch and chief executive of a global organisation comprising one billion souls – this is no job for an old man. I would go further and say that it is no job for any mere mortal, regardless of age or gender. The huge burden of expectation heaped on to the shoulders of the Pope from the moment of his accession to the papal throne – and not just by the members of his own flock – must be daunting for the bravest of spirits.
I would also argue that the specific expectation that the Pope's "proclamations on faith and morals are deemed infallible", as defined by the First Vatican Council as late in the life of the church as 1870-71, has not made the papal task any easier. This is especially so in view of the fact that there is widespread ignorance among both loyal Catholics and non-Catholics with regard to the extent to which any particular papal statement can be regarded as infallible.
Perhaps it's high time that both Catholics and other people of faith gave the Pope – whoever he turns out to be – a break. Like the rest of us he is a mere mortal.
Ian O Bayne,
8 Clarence Drive, Glasgow.
Unlike Colette Douglas Home, I do not wish the Catholic Church to enter the modern world, a world of corruption, dishonesty and selfishness.
I hope the next Pope manages to reform the behaviour of Catholics – not the teaching of the Catholic Church, which is and always has been the teaching of Christ. Modernists who wish the church to accommodate itself to their wishes remind me of children who complain to their mothers "You don't love me" when they are not allowed to do things that are bad for them.
John Kelly,
16 Park Avenue, Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article